February 28, 2007
GCRIO Program Overview
Our extensive collection of documents.
Archives of the
Global Climate Change Digest
A Guide to Information on Greenhouse Gases and Ozone Depletion
Published July 1988 through June 1999
FROM VOLUME 8, NUMBER 10, OCTOBER 1995
REPUBLICANS VS. MONTREAL PROTOCOL
Several Republicans in the U.S.
Congress are leading an attack on the country's commitments to the Montreal
Protocol. At a Sep. 20 hearing, Representatives John Doolittle (California) and
Tom Delay (Texas) expressed doubt over the necessity for phasing out CFCs by the
end of this year, citing insufficient scientific evidence and the costs of
switching to alternative chemicals, and basing their positions largely on the
views of atmospheric scientist S. Fred Singer and a few others. Testifying in
support of the protocol were scientists Daniel Albritton of NOAA, Robert Watson
of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, and industry groups,
who base their position on the Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion:
1994, written by an international panel of scientists (GLOBAL CLIMATE
CHANGE DIGEST News, Oct. 1994).
The following references are all 1995:
"Ozone on Trial: Congress Gives Skeptics a Day in the Sun," R.
Monastersky, Science News, p. 238, Oct. 7
"Congressional Hearing into CFC Controls Evolves into Test of
Scientists' Credibility," Intl. Environ. Rptr., pp. 769-770, Oct.
"Leave Ozone Hole to Nature, Say the Republicans," V. Kiernan,
New Scientist, p. 8, Sep. 30.
"Don't Confuse Me with the Facts," M. Jacobs, Chem. Eng. News,
p. 5, Oct. 9. Editorial.
"[Methyl Bromide] Ban Could Be Reversed in the U.S.," Chem. &
Industry, p. 760, Oct. 2.
Guide to Publishers
Index of Abbreviations